The European Commission has agreed to pay a fine of 400 euros to a German citizen following an investigation by the German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI).
Reason for the fine:
The violation was related to the use of the Matomo analytics tool on the European Commission website.
The tool stored users' IP addresses without proper anonymization, which is contrary to the principles of the GDPR.
This is the first time that an EU institution has paid a fine for violating personal data processing rules.
What does this mean?
Liability for EU institutions: EU institutions can now be held liable for violating the GDPR. There have been similar cases before – for example, in 2021, the European Parliament faced criticism over incorrect cookie banners.
**A new wave of technical reviews: **companies must carefully check the analytics tools they use. Even if the service is positioned as “GDPR-compliant”, it is necessary to ensure strict anonymization of the data.
**Symbolic fine vs. real punishment: **The maximum fine for EU institutions under Regulation 2018/1725 is 50,000 euros. This is incomparable with the multi-billion euro sanctions against the private sector, which calls into question the fairness of the regulation.
**Strengthening citizen control: **This case shows that citizens can successfully challenge the practices of even large public institutions. Similar complaints have previously led to litigation, such as the case against the French app TousAntiCovid (2022).
"Despite the small amount, this event confirms that the regulation applies even to its creators, strengthening citizens' trust in data protection.
However, this raises the issue of double standards: private companies pay billions in fines, while EU institutions get away with symbolic sanctions.
To preserve its reputation, the EU needs to reconsider this imbalance and introduce tougher fines for public authorities and large corporations. "
By contacting us, you will receive:
Consultation on GDPR compliance and data protection.
Consultation on the correct use of analytical tools and cookies.
Analysis of risks and vulnerabilities when working with personal data in the EU.
Support in proceedings and filing complaints about GDPR violations.
Development of a compliance strategy to comply with local and international acts on the protection of personal data.